May. 06, 2022 – 11:36 – Fox News host reflects on the left’s response to the possible overturn of Roe v. Wade, the state of the Biden presidency, and gives his take on the Russia-Ukraine war on ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight.’
Source:
Tucker: Biden has turned out to be an unparalleled disaster
Jason Miyares vows to push back on the progressive ‘criminal first, victim last’ mindset on ‘Sunday Night in America.’
Source:
It’s tragic Biden doesn’t show outrage for these victims: Virginia AG
By Carrie K. Hutchens
I don’t approve of violence, and while I wish no one had entered the Capitol building on January 6th, it certainly wasn’t a domestic terrorist attack or an insurrection. Anyone who suggests it was, is either uninformed, an indoctrinated puppet or a sleazy gaslighter that has something to gain from the lie and the continued attack on Trump and his supporters. Count on it.
I’m quite tired of the Collins, McConnells and all the others in Congress who present themselves as oh so righteous, while being both blind and bullheaded. Yes, I am giving some of them the benefit of the doubt, though I’m not sure they deserve it. They’re in Congress, after all, so they must know more than any of us, right? At least that is how some of them come across as thinking.
Trump did not ask ole Pence to void the electoral votes. He asked him to delay the count, until thorough investigations could be carried out. I heard that was a legit request and it is one that should have been honored, not for Trump, but for the voters. Hear that Pence? For the “legally registered voters.”
I, for one, don’t want to hear how there was no evidence of voter fraud. Kind of difficult to gather evidence when no one is bothering to look for any or half-arse doing so, don’t you think?
If a bank employee called and said there was money stolen from the bank, would you likewise merely say there was no evidence? No, you would expect an investigation would be carried out. Funds would be compared to what funds were supposed to be there per documentation. And once that was completed, an investigation would ensue to ascertain who had access and by what means it was possible for any of those people to readily remove the missing money.
By the way, embezzlement can often go on for years before being detected. But you think in 24 to 48 hours, one can ascertain that, though there was voter fraud, it wasn’t enough to change the outcome of an election?
I have a bridge for sale, as they say.
There are many questionable things that occurred Election Day and night. Why would anyone blow it off? Would they do so if it weren’t for the fact that everything odd (suspicious) went against President Trump?
The oh so righteous should especially ask themselves that question. Does their hatred of Trump blind them to the truth or the desire to seek it?
I think it does.
The problem with thinking, even subconsciously, that it’s okay for cheating to have occurred because it is only Trump – is that once it is done to one – it can be done to anyone and everyone. It opens the gate. Yes, it opens the gate to a world of broken rules, cheating, lying and “by any means necessary” behavior. No one is safe under such a realm – not even the self-righteous Trump hating people in Congress.
I’ll be honest.
Every time someone says things such as, “Trump’s false claims” or “without evidence” – I blow my stack.
Those people sure have lit a fire under me and not in a good way. They are calling me a liar. They are lying to me about me. They are telling me that what I saw I did not see no matter that I did. And, of course, they are doing this very thing to everyone else that saw inappropriate behavior and/or discrepancies. This is called “gaslighting” and it is not acceptable behavior under any circumstances – not even by the so-called righteous.
I can truthfully say that if I saw the very same things occurring to a candidate I was totally against – I would feel it as wrong as I do with this situation with Trump and the 2020 Election. I don’t believe in lying or cheating, even about or towards people I can’t stand.
Call it wrongful behavior. Call it a criminal act. But don’t call what transpired on January 6th an insurrection or an act of domestic terror by Trump supporters. It was neither. It was merely, by Trump supporters anyways, an attempt to be heard and a rightful call for an investigation prior to confirming as true what was actually questionable. We voters do, after all, deserve election results that are assured to be true and accurate. That’s how it is supposed to work. Did it?
Copyright © 2022 Carrie K. Hutchens
By Daniel Idfresne
Published January 01, 2022
Many today are concerned about the rising generation’s exposure to a cultural virus, that is being “woke”—and rightly so. But I’m one from that generation who has been inoculated against it. My Christian upbringing, my time in a public charter school, and my history teacher’s use of the Socratic method provided a foundation I needed to withstand it all.
Too many of my Gen Z peers aren’t on such solid ground, however.
‘WOKE’ NYC SCHOOL CURRICULUM PROMPTS DAD TO MOVE DAUGHTER TO FLORIDA
The nuclear family and American education are disintegrating—and traditional values are disappearing along with it. This leaves teenagers with no framework nor principles by which they can heroically live. It’s my generation’s void. In it, they fall victim to woke ideology and become bullies. Sadly, too many of my friends adopt fraudulent values to signal virtue, and in turn browbeat my classmates who don’t.
Daniel Idfresne is a senior at Brooklyn Technical High School, a prestigious public school in New York City. (Courtesy Daniel Idfresne)
Consider the protests and riots summer of 2020. My peers denounced their “white privilege” on social media and shared provocative posts to prove it. But if white privilege is real, drive-by activism won’t fix anything. Social justice theater collapses under the burden of real oppression.
When empty platitudes no longer sufficed, my woke classmates embraced more radical views. An open call for racial justice quickly became a disingenuous call to overthrow America’s Founding principles and institutions. Their ideas were not carefully thought out, but social media applauded them with coveted “likes.” (Click to Continue Reading)
Full Article & Source:
Woke politics hijack my Gen Z classmates’ hero’s path
Source:
Gowdy: I thought this was a joke
Take the 4 minutes to watch this.
Share it.
This is the truth that we need a critical mass of citizens to understand. https://t.co/Z0mopz9tiL
— Robert Patrick Lewis (@RobertPLewis) October 8, 2021
By Sam Dorman
Florida mom Quisha King called for a “mass exodus” from the public school system, arguing that school systems left parents with no other choice for fighting left-wing ideas.
Her comments came during the annual Family Research Council’s Pray Vote Stand Summit during a Thursday panel on “Fighting Indoctrination on a National Scale.”
“I really think at this point the only thing to do is have a mass exodus from the public school system – that’s it,” King said. In response, she received prolonged applause, and many in the audience stood to their feet at the Leesburg, Virginia, event.
King previously drew national attention for her speech opposing critical race theory (CRT) in June. She works with the group Moms for Liberty, which is one of many battling CRT and other ideas across the nation.
“With this FBI thing, it just made me realize – what else are we supposed to do?” King asked. “Standing up to these people doesn’t seem to matter. I mean, we have – all of us – we’ve been at these school board meetings, we’ve been voicing our opinions, we’re writing articles, we’re emailing teachers – we’re doing all that stuff. And they don’t care. I’m like the only thing left to do is to just peace out.”
She added that “it has to be us doing it together” in order to “really send the message that you do not have the right to indoctrinate our children.”
Her comments came amid an uproar over the Department of Justice’s announcement that the FBI would investigate potential violence at school board meetings. Attorney General Merrick Garland’s memo on the issue raised concerns as it appeared to be in response to a National School Boards Association (NSBA) letter suggesting that officials were encountering a form of “domestic terrorism.”
“While spirited debate about policy matters is protected under our Constitution, that protection does not extend to threats of violence or efforts to intimidate individuals based on their views,” Garland’s memo states.
Still, critics like Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., have raised concerns about DOJ restricting free speech – pointing to language in NSBA’s letter that disparaged anti-CRT efforts.
Full Article & Source:
Mom gets standing ovation after calling for ‘mass exodus’ from public schools
Dear Jessica:
I am writing in response to your appearance on “The Five” in which parent rebellion against the schools and government was discussed. You said, in part:
“JESSICA TARLOV, FOX NEWS CHANNEL CONTRIBUTOR: There’s so much though. So, Joe Biden thinks the Taliban is worse than Mrs. Montgomery, so just for the record there. We were showing footage split screen there of parents screaming at educators and going to these school board meetings or videos of parents outside of school getting up in the faces of these teachers.”
I’m not saying there’s a violation under the Patriot Act but this is not just like, hey, could you give me a callback, I’m a little concerned about what’s going on — ” (‘The Five’ on Biden pushing socialism on Americans – This is a rush transcript from “The Five,” October 5, 2021. This copy may not be in its final form and may be updated.)
Wait until the schools and/or government try to take over your child and they TELL YOU how you will raise your son or daughter. Wait until they teach that young one what they want, regardless of, and in spite of, your opinion. As a matter of fact, wait until your opinion isn’t allowed. Although you are more educated and knowledgeable than most of them, wait until you are helpless against the fascists.
Yes, wait until it is you that keep running into a wall, as you try to protect that child from a radical force of people that you find harmful to your child. Wait until no one listens. Wait until you can do nothing. Wait until they take away all your options to fight back. Wait until they make you helpless. Wait until you are deemed a domestic terrorist for simply disagreeing and saying so. Then remember the day that you didn’t condemn them when it was other parents fighting for their children. Wait until you are them.
Yes, wait until you are them and then let’s see how you respond. Let’s see what you say. Let’s see what you do. Let’s see if you regret not stepping in at the onset and be a part of returning education to a learning experience, rather than an indoctrination by power hungry radicals that think they know better than you and have a “right” to decide what is best for your child.
Wait or take another path. Step up now and help stop this wrongful madness. As someone once said, “Be a part of the solution – not the problem.”
Your move, new mother-to-be. Your move.
Sincerely,
Carrie K. Hutchens
‘Can you hear the screams of the Afghans, America?’
The Afghan people left behind are fighting to survive much like Jewish victims in Nazi Germany, “Life, Liberty & Levin” host Mark Levin compared Wednesday on “Hannity.”
“How many Anne Franks are there tonight in Afghanistan?” he asked. “How many Anne Franks are hiding in cellars all across the country today? I want to talk about the people left behind, not the 124,000 who’ve been evacuated to safety. I want to talk about the millions who now have had genocide unleashed upon them.”
Levin pointed out that the Afghans were living “mostly in peace” and safety before Joe Biden’s presidency with a “minimal American military footprint.”
Levin hit out against who he called “propagandists” in the administration including press secretaries Jen Psaki of the White House, Adm. John Kirby of the Pentagon, state department spokesman Ned Price as well as generals who he blasted for leaving American citizens in Afghanistan.
“No commander in chief has ever ordered any general to leave citizens behind,” he roared. “What about these children and these women? What about the Afghan allies – the men who fought next to use firefight after firefight?” (Click to continue reading)
Source:
Mark Levin: How many Anne Franks are in Afghanistan tonight?
MY OPINION: I FIRMLY BELIEVE THAT THE CAPITOL POLICE SHOULD CHANGE THEIR TITLE TO “PUSSY PATROL!” ~Carrie K. Hutchens
Source:
Tucker Carlson reacts to Capitol Police officer speaking out about shooting Ashli Babbitt
By Charles Creitz
Several media figures and others in the baseball establishment are being slammed for hastily and ultimately falsely accusing a Colorado Rockies fan of repeatedly yelling a racial slur at a Miami Marlins player who is Black, with some later making an about-face on the matter.
When the Marlins’ Lewis Brinson, 27, was at the plate in the ninth inning on Sunday, microphones at Coors Field in Denver picked up the fan repeatedly yelling something many critics immediately declared to be the n-word, ostensibly directed at the opposing team’s batter.
A review of the situation found that the fan, who has not been identified, was in fact shouting “Dinger!” at the Rockies’ purple triceratops mascot. The man was reportedly trying to get Dinger’s attention so that it could take a photograph with his grandchildren.
But many on social media circulated video of the incident assuming that the man was yelling a racial epithet. (Click to continue reading how an innocent man was wrongly attacked)
Full Article & Source:
Media lead charge to smear Rockies fan they falsely accused of using racial slur toward Marlins outfielder
While Disneyland may be the “Happiest Place on Earth,” a California probate court may be the opposite for a Disney heir, mused the U.S. Court of Appeals in Lund v. Cowan (9th Cir. 2021) ___ F.3d ___. Bradford Lund, a 50 year-old grandson of Walt Disney, sued the probate judge who rejected a settlement agreement that would have allowed him to access his approximately $200 million inheritance, and the federal appellate court affirmed the dismissal of the suit.
The real drama has played out in the probate department of the Los Angeles County Superior Court. Litigation there has spanned 15 years with no FASTPASS or end in sight. Bradford’s story is unlike any Disney movie we have seen, but equally entertaining. (Click to continue)
Full Article & Source:
Disney Grandson Languishes in the “Unhappiest Place on Earth”
By Sam Dorman | Fox News
The Rhode Island branch of a major teachers union is suing to block a school district from fulfilling a mother’s public records requests, citing the sheer volume of requests and concerns about teacher privacy.
The case revolves around a mom, Nicole Solas, who caught national attention for her quest to address critical race theory (CRT) in her child’s district. School board members previously considered suing Solas over her copious records requests – at least 200 – but declined prior to the recent lawsuit.
“We are asking the Court to conduct a balancing test to determine whether our members’ privacy rights outweigh the public interest,” said Jennifer Azevedo, who serves as deputy director of the National Education Association Rhode Island (NEARI). “We believe they do, and those records should either not be disclosed or should be redacted accordingly.”
In a filing dated Thursday, NEARI requested a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction from the state’s superior court. Both Solas and employees of the school district are named as defendants.
Solas fired back, telling Fox News, “You cannot be employed by the state and also demand immunity from public scrutiny. That’s not how open government works in America. Academic transparency is not a collective bargaining negotiation. It’s a parental right.”
Today the teacher union NEA filed ANOTHER lawsuit against me – this time a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Will teacher unions bullying moms be an everyday thing now? pic.twitter.com/6WxQ8KTAFD
— Nicole Solas (@Nicoletta0602) August 5, 2021
NEARI’s verified complaint, which was filed Monday, states: “Given the circumstances of the requests, it is likely that any teachers who are identifiable and have engaged in discussions about things like critical race theory will then be the subject of teacher harassment by national conservative groups opposed to critical race theory.”
Cornell law professor William Jacobson also argued that “[t]his lawsuit makes little sense on its face. The unions purport to be protecting their members non-public documents and information, but the public records law only applies to “public records“ as defined under the statute.”
The filing from Monday, however, seeks for the court to examine certain categories of documents which are “potentially public records” under the Access to Public Records Act.
It adds that if records aren’t determined to constitute a “clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy,” they should be disclosed with redactions of personally identifiable information or “information which may lead to the identity of such teachers.”
The lawsuit reflected an ongoing battle playing out across the country where frustrated parents are demanding answers from education officials.
Both the NEA and American Federation of Teachers (AFT) have opposed efforts to limit CRT and its related ideas in school. NEA previously approved a resolution conveying its desire to fight “anti-CRT rhetoric.”
Another prompted Senate Republicans’ scrutiny by declaring that the NEA would “research the organizations attacking educators doing anti-racist work and/or use the research already done and put together a list of resources and recommendations for state affiliates, locals, and individual educators to utilize when they are attacked.”
Full Article & Source:
Teachers union sues Rhode Island mom over critical race theory public records requests, cites teacher privacy
By Joshua Rhett Miller | New York Post
Two women who stole a “Make America Great Again” hat from a President Trump supporter at the Democratic National Convention have pleaded guilty to hate crimes in connection to the viral confrontation.
Source:
Two women plead guilty to hate crime for attacking Trump supporters
by Carrie K. Hutchens / on March 24, 2017 at 6:12 am /
Photo credit: Voice of America
The Democrats and anti-Trump forces seem to be so blinded by their hatred of the president that they have lost their ability to think coherently. What else can one think when reviewing what has been transpiring? It is so obvious. Well, obvious to those of us who are not blinded by either hatred or the wish to destroy Donald Trump simply because he is Trump and perhaps a Republican.
Hillary Clinton was quite excited when she believed a Trump Tower server was communicating with Russia & she let the world know. The question is – how did she know this was being checked into?
There was a transcript of Flynn’s discussion with the Russian ambassador. The question is – how did we find out?
For all the accusations some Democrats have been & continue making, an important factor has gone unnoticed in their little thought processors of incoherence. If there wasn’t any surveillance, how did surveillance gather the above information? (i.e. If one can only get to town by driving and they are in town – it’s a pretty sure bet they drove to town.)
Comey testified that there was no wiretap on Trump. Why didn’t he add that while there was technically no “wiretap” – Trump and/or his team had been included in “incidental collection”, unmasked and the information shared among many? He knew about it, didn’t he? He knew it was shared, didn’t he? So, why did he answer in such a way as to make it look as though Trump was lying or simply ignorant?
Attorney General Sessions was asked a long, rambling question by Sen. Franken. The short of the story – or question – was if Sessions had any contact with the Russians with regard to the campaign. He said he didn’t. However, thereafter, the Democrats accused him of lying because he had two meetings with the Russian ambassador, unrelated to the campaign, that he had failed to mention. Didn’t seem to matter that many in Congress have met with this very same ambassador. Didn’t seem to matter that some even met with Putin. Didn’t seem to matter that the question was in relationship to the campaign – Sessions should have, by their opinion, thought to say, “No, but I did meet with the ambassador in the course of my duties as senator.”
Then Senator Sessions was being questioned about the campaign – not his duties and meetings as a senator. He answered the question asked. His meetings with the ambassador were irrelevant to the issues at hand because they were not related to the campaign. Comey, on the other hand, was being questioned about Trump and/or his team being under surveillance and he knew it. He took advantage of “technical wordage”. He took advantage of Trump using the term “wiretap”, though knowing exactly what was meant and that it was relevant and specific to the question presented. In short, he intentionally misled the committee and the public. This should be of grave concern to each and every one of us. It is to me.
Additionally, why would it take so long to establish there was collusion (or not) between the Trump campaign & Russia, but so quickly be able to establish there was no surveillance on Trump & team? Why haven’t they been able to identify the person responsible for leaking material, but able to say no person was involved in Trump surveillance? Seems the only fast investigations they are able to perform is if it is an attempt to discredit the president and his team. Amazing!
After Senator Nunes gave the press conference and notified the White House of what he had learned, Schiff was upset because Nunes hadn’t shared the info with the committee first. And, now that the White House has been notified, Schiff feels there cannot be a fair hearing? Why? How does Nunes sharing the information affect the hearings? After all, the Democrats have been insisting all along that Trump, as president, could pick up the phone and obtain all this information first hand. What does it matter then that Nunes provided Trump what Trump could freely get on his own?
My personal opinion is that Trump didn’t wish to pick up the phone and ask for the information because, if he did, the Democrats and media would claim it was tainted, manipulated and completely false. Instead, I believe he simply waited for the truth to come out, as he knew it would once people started paying attention to the evidence that was readily available all along.
By whatever term is utilized – Trump and his team were obviously under surveillance. Information was gathered by some means and shared. It really doesn’t matter if it was a physical wiretap such as they had in the 1960’s or information grabbed from the sky. Somebody captured it. Somebody gathered it. Somebody shared it. Somebody leaked it. The latter of which, without question, is illegal.
Schiff & Pals try to make it all important that Trump used the word “wiretap”. When Trump clarifies he was referring to surveillance – they try to say he is walking back his allegation because he has no proof.
Schiff is upset because Senator Nunes was provided info, which he discussed at a Press Conference and then shared with the White House. If it is so important for Nunes to have shared with the committee first, why hasn’t Schiff provided the committee with the absolute proof he claims to have? And if he has absolute proof, why are they wasting time and money on an unnecessary hearing to establish what is in his possession? Might it be because he doesn’t have the proof he claims?
The Democrats seem to want one set of rules for themselves and a set of rules for people that aren’t them. And in recent years, it seems that is exactly how things have played out. Perhaps they have gotten too used to successfully bullying and are unable to comprehend that those days are over. They are making fools of themselves and doing it for all of us to see.
But I digress. (It’s easy to do, when trying to make sense out of the Democrat & media nonsense.)
The Democrats know that Jeff Sessions was asked if there was any Russian involvement in the campaign and that he answered truthfully. They know but it didn’t stop them from trying to create an illusion of dishonesty to bring him down.
Comey intentionally provided a dishonest answer to the committee and to the public. There is no way the Democrats aren’t aware of this fact, yet they are using that dishonest answer to claim Trump is the one being dishonest.
The out-of-control Democrats and media shower us every day with their little saga of incoherence. They speculate and deem it facts. They twist, spin and manipulate information and call it evidence. They tell us there was no surveillance, but surveillance may have picked up Trump & Associates in “incidental collection”. There were leaks of gathered information, but there was no surveillance, so I suppose we are to assume it poofed into someone’s possession as they happened to walk by the poof-receipt desk.
One day of fair reporting only and honest investigation would be a welcomed respite from the saga of incoherence and lock-step mindset of the out-of-control libs, their media buds & the brainwashed that blindly follow them. It might also be the shock moment that opens minds and lets the truth and rational thought back in. The day some Democrats fear most – a day President Trump keeps still another promise and the swamp gets a little less occupied!
Copyright © 2017 & 2021 Carrie K. Hutchens
By Carrie K. Hutchens
I don’t care if people accuse me of being pro-cancel culture. It is, after all, the least of what I have been called over the past few years by the gaslighters and indoctrinated puppets that fail to use the brains God gave them, as a tool to process and conclude based on reality, rather then “as told to.”
I used to willingly watch various shows on Fox News, such as “The Five,” “Outnumbered” and “Greg Gutfeld.” Now I only willingly watch Tucker and Greg’s show, if I watch anything at all. Why? Because I do not like liars. I do not care to listen to them or watch their stupid facial features meant to call the other person’s comments untrue. Or, how about the Richard Fowler types that take over the segment with their interrupting, talking over everyone and just downright being rude? I don’t need it.
I have often said – and definitely mean – that it is one thing to have differing opinions presented and quite another to allow lies to be spouted and unchecked by people who insist on finishing their incorrect and untrue comments. And there you have it… this is why I won’t watch my once favorite shows on Fox News. Too many Libs get by with repeating over and over and over – things that aren’t true, especially about, but not limited to, Trump and/or his supporters.
I’m not over-protective of President Trump. I have no hesitation to call him out, if he has done or said something wrong. However, as we all know (or at least those of us that think with our own brains), Trump is always blamed for everything and then some by the MSM & other Trump haters, even when he hadn’t a thing to do with it or NEVER SAID WHAT THEY SAY HE SAID.
I can’t stand liars and do not associate with them in real time. Why would I waste my time in front of a television listening to them and watching those eye-rolls, smirks and shaking heads? I wouldn’t and I don’t and I won’t.
It’s one thing for Fox News, for example, to have Libs or anti-Trumpers on to provide the opposing view-point, but quite another to allow distortions that amount to lies. Fox News should have a rule that only the truth is allowed and if caught lying – the person will be suspended, until they can control their urge to lie about those on the other side of the aisle, including President Trump.
If Libs think my opinion makes me a hypocrite and part of the “cancel culture” – so be it! I don’t care. As a matter of fact, I’ll proudly claim to be a member of the “Cancel Lies & Propaganda Culture!” It is, after all, a culture worth developing and being a part of!
Copyright © 2021 Carrie K. Hutchens
By Carrie K. Hutchens
It’s difficult for me to understand how people who fight for justice for themselves or others, can then find it acceptable for someone else to be treated unjustly and lied about? But that is what I see too often transpiring.
In my lifetime, I’ve spent a great deal of energy fighting for others, especially underdogs that seemed to be standing alone against the powerful or at least more powerful than they. Sometimes I was directly involved in the cases and other times, I was merely someone striving to get the truth out and the attention of others, who were in a position to fight the particular injustice.
No matter my part, big or small, I was all in on fighting against whatever the injustice was.
I’ve seen innocent people look totally guilty. Likewise, I have seen guilty people look totally innocent. Appearance can be absolutely deceiving and often are – especially in today’s insane world, where deceit is accepted if applied to those not agreeing or somehow in the way. You know, like President Trump. The man who has often been in the way of what so many have wanted.
I don’t know how many times I have heard people say that Trump lied about things that he did not lie about. It was a lie that he lied. In short, numerous times, I have asked people to name the lies they are accusing President Trump of. Each time, there has either been a response of silence or an allegation of something not true or something he said or did that was taken out of context to give the appearance of something not true.
Yet, some don’t care.
Some don’t care the President has been lied about or treated unfairly because they don’t like him. The latter supposedly makes it okay. But it doesn’t.
No one should be treated unfairly or lied about. If it is wrong – it is wrong no matter who does it or who it is done to. Liking the person or being the person is, or should be, irrelevant if we truly believe in justice for anyone, including self.
In addition to some thinking it is okay to lie about Trump – it’s amazing how so many are saying there isn’t any evidence to support the Trump Team’s claims without their own evidence that there is no evidence. These people simply throw their allegations out there – without evidence – with the expectation that their word is all that is necessary. In a sense, they are right.
Many people only hear news from media that is hostile to President Trump. Media that doesn’t share much, if anything, that is ever positive involving him. Therefore, there are many things those viewers aren’t aware of. As a result, too many too often get dug in and ready to believe anything bad said about Trump and refuse to listen to anything that challenges those beliefs.
I had some contacts that I thought the world of. I would have sworn that their integrity was beyond reproach and nothing could ever shake it. Then came Trump and the hatred of him. Sadly, I watched some become everything I believed they could never be – liars.
Then there are those people, who were treated wrongly, who now seem to think being treated wrongly is wrong, unless it is President Trump, of course. Somehow, in their minds, he is fair game because they have believed all the lies about him and failed to see all he has done for them. They just believe what they were fed, while fighting to get the courts and supporters to not believe all the non-truths involved in their case or the case of someone they were fighting for.
Amazing.
Court decisions are not always right or fair.
Investigations are not always thorough, whether by intent or by obstacles blocking those in pursuit of the truth.
Truth assertion is claimed by propaganda artists and truth-tellers alike.
Not all is as it seems.
Major media is not necessarily your friend providing truthful information. Sometimes… some of them… are nothing more than gaslighters leading you to where they, and their masters, wish you to be, so you can be controlled and think what they want you to think, as obviously they have done with many.
This election should concern us.
Perhaps you were for Joe Biden, but do you really want him to win if he has only won by lying and cheating by any? If your answer is yes, will you feel it is okay for the next person to win that way as well – especially if it is not a person you are for? Or, is it only okay if it is done to Trump and your person always wins?
Biden may have won. How do we know though, as things have and are transpiring? How can we trust an election that has had Trump votes given to Biden and all the other irregularities? Shouldn’t we want our elections to be on the up and up? Shouldn’t we want to know? Shouldn’t we want to be assured we were right and our vote was, and always is, counted accurately?
Yes, this election, and many other things, should concern us all.
We should never give the stamp of approval for lying and cheating no matter who it is done to or who it is done by. Truth and justice only exists when we demand truth and justice for all – including those we don’t even particularly like. And, yes, that includes President Trump.
Copyright © 2020 Carrie K. Hutchens
Still image from – “Hello Baltimore by Lloyd Marcus the Unhyphenated American” video – 2015
By Carrie K. Hutchens
I’ve met some gaslighters throughout my life-time, but never in the abundance found in present day society. It’s overwhelming. It’s maddening. It’s enough to make a pacifist go ballistic and not so gently put some faces (along with the bodies) in a corner for a major forced time-out.
Oh, and those little indoctrinated puppets that think they are so very smart and righteous make a polite person want to scream all those words we thought we would never use.
Who raised those brats who have no impulse control and think they have some special right to kick people in the head (attempted murder in my book) and not have anyone fight back? Who taught them that it was pure and good to run in packs in search of a helpless victim to viciously beat, stomp and kick without mercy?
The feral monsters roaming the streets looking for prey have lost their way – if ever they had it to begin with. They are nothing more than a plague the masters have released upon society to cause a chaos they blame on the opposition… a chaos they claim they can save us from.
It’s all a game.
A dirty game.
A game only the dishonest and vicious would instigate.
The masters have no conscience, as they seek power and more power and even that isn’t enough – they must have the ultimate power to control all people and all things at all times.
The indoctrinated have no clue.
It’s said quite frequently that Trump supporters are a cult, which would suggest that they mindlessly follow him with no thought of their own. How wrong those are who say it and those who believe it. Trump supporters are not of “one mind” or “one thought” and definitely not into “talking points” such as seen on MSM, where it seems everyone is following the same script hour after hour, day after day.
Nope! You aren’t going to see Trump supporters parroting talking points like good little puppets. They think and talk for themselves – obviously so.
I’ve never seen or heard of Trump supporters stopping traffic, pulling someone out of the vehicle, beating the heck out of them and kicking the person in the head for the heck of it, but I have seen the feral monsters of the Left do so and so have you, if you follow the chaos on the internet.
All that violence is from the Left… allowed by the Left… and protected by the Left.
(Who encourages them… allows them to do… and bails them out after they have?)
MSM spews the lie that the rioters are the victims (or champions of same) and we are all to blame, and therefore, by insinuation, if not direct claim, that we deserve the violence, destruction, injury and even death at the hands of these so-called victims, aka champions.
BS
Yes, that is right.
I call BS, as you should.
I call it as I should, as you should, as every normal and law-abiding person should.
The feral monsters are obviously physically dangerous and meant to terrify the population. There seems to be no reasoning with them, once they have their sights on a chosen victim.
Then there are the indoctrinated puppets that get on Twitter, for example, and proclaim they are all knowledgeable and everyone else that doesn’t agree with them are ignorant racist Trump-supporting Walmart shoppers who probably live in trailers and don’t have degrees, because after all, that is what they are told the opposition either is or to accuse them of that anyways. Alinsky tactics come to mind, as well they should.
The latter indoctrinated puppets are quite dangerous in their own way.
While the feral monsters are meant to gain power and conquer the population by fear, the latter indoctrinated puppets are used for mind control, so to speak.
They sound smart and in control.
They lie.
They say lies well.
They toy with peoples’ minds.
They are gaslighters-in-waiting.
They may not even have a clue they were gaslighted.
Maybe they do.
What they don’t do is refer to history or even current events about how this story has played out elsewhere and will play out here, if they win the game.
They “think” they will be the winners.
Wrong!
They are only tools… only a means. They are/were never meant to be anything more, should the Left win this battle of the souls. After all, there are only a few slots at the top of the power grab and only a select few were ever intended to occupy them.
Think a puppet would be given one of those precious slots?
I hate gaslighters and indoctrinated puppets.
(Did I say that already?)
Both try to convince you truth is a lie and lie is a truth.
One is trying to redefine truth into what they say it is for the purpose of taking control. The other is a fool that has fallen for all the gaslighting and is nothing more than a tool to be tossed aside, should the gaslighter win the game.
The irony…
Only a few slots exist in a realm of dictatorship.
(Did I say that already?)
Not all gaslighters get a slot either, but I guess they haven’t figured that out yet.
I enjoy knowing that I am far smarter than the puppet, since I think for myself, rather than think what someone feeds me to think.
I enjoy being smarter than a gaslighter as well. I don’t need to make others think they are crazy, so I can win by forcing wrongful thoughts and illusions upon them.
I enjoy not having to chase people down and beat them to death, or near death, for the lack of impulse control and whatever else creates such feral monsters that I am not.
I hate gaslighters and indoctrinated puppets.
Oh yes, I do.
I’m ready for sanity and law and order to return and put them out of business.
It’s time.
Copyright © 2020 Carrie K. Hutchens
I never thought I would see it, but here we are. The concept is no longer merely works of fiction. We are living a present day version of George Orwell’s 1984 and Animal Farm combined. Who would have thought so many “modern” people could be so very indoctrinated as to fall for the elite’s and elite wannabee’s spiel of lies?
We’re watching riots. There is no misunderstanding of what they are. Buildings and cars are being destroyed and burned. Citizens and police officers alike are being viciously attacked. Yet, a multitude of Democrats call it peaceful protesting and suggest the Republicans, Bill Barr and whomever else is trying to prevent people’s right to protest.
Are these Democrats that delusional or do they think we are that stupid and they will be able to convince the rest of us that the lie is the truth and the truth is the lie?
Watching and listening to a portion of the Judicial Committee hearing hosting Attorney General Bill Barr on Tuesday, July 28, 2020, I not only wanted to scream at the power seekers – I did scream at them. I screamed at them for slinging false allegations and then refusing to give the attorney general an opportunity to respond. Their behavior was childish, hateful, deceitful and worse – a conspiracy in motion.
I’d say there is no excuse for the behavior of the Democrats on that committee, but there is a reason. They are trying to grab power not rightfully theirs. They are attempting to lie their way into that power not earned nor freely given them. And… obviously… they will try to destroy anyone and anything in the way of that power grab. That, or they are simply mentally ill and so delusional that they cannot ascertain the difference between their fictional concept floating around in their defective brains & the reality actually transpiring before them. Either way – they are in the wrong.
Someone in the right need not lie nor deceive to prove their allegation or position is true. They present facts and give reason why their position should be the accepted one.
These Democrats and Republicans of ill-intent, on the other hand, tend to deceive and deceive some more!
It’s pathetic!
It’s definitely unbelievable that so many regular people are falling for the radical lib lies. How can that be? Simply use the brain without bias and one should be able to see what has been transpiring. It’s right there in plain sight. Unless one is only watching hate-Trump networks and like print material, where only half-truths (full lies) are told and the spin leaves out important information, while at the minimum offering spin, spin, spin.
Friendly reminder: Protests do not involve looting, destruction and attacks on police and others. That is RIOTING and criminal behavior.
Back to the liberal narrative…
A journalist I had admired, and liked as a person as well, surprised me a few months ago. She suggested that President Trump had mocked Serge Kovaleski disability, something that had been debunked years ago. Being good at her job – she should have known that – or did she and said it anyway to put down Trump? I don’t know. I’ll probably never know. However, I did tweet her about it and sent along a video as a reminder.
To this day, there are people who don’t like Trump because they believe he mocked the reporter’s disability. As a result, these people despise the president and see (judge) everything he says as does based on the person they believe him to be – not the person he is. In short, they are against anything he says or does prior to him saying or doing it.
If anyone needs a reminder…
Serge’s disability does not involve flailing. He has arthrogryposis.
The flailing that Trump did is what he has done for years in reference to people being flustered or frustrated. He did it in reference to Ted Cruz, too. Did anyone accuse the president of mocking his disability? Oh! That’s right. Senator Cruz doesn’t have a disability.
What about the lie that President Trump didn’t disavow David Duke, though he has repeatedly done so over the years. It’s a lie, but it was repeatedly said and to this day, even with video proof out there that it is a lie – there are people who still believe that Trump is pals with Duke.
What about the lie that President Trump said there were good people on both sides and that he was referring to the KKK and White Nationalist? No! He was talking about the people that came to protest for and against keeping the statue. That should have been obvious to anyone actually listening to what he was saying – yet… many are repeating the lie (some on purpose & some unknowingly) and other people are hating Trump and calling him a racist because of the lie – not because he is.
What I do love is when people state for fact that Trump is a liar and lies all the time, yet, when asked, to name the lies – they can’t do it. Why? Because most of the people I’ve run into that are making the claim have no idea what the alleged lies are. They are merely parroting what they have heard or been told to say.
Turns out that one of our fine outlets (sarcasm) was allegedly counting what they considered a lie, as a separate lie every time the president stated it. In other words, if an economist stated a five dollar bill was worth $5 and Trump repeated it, but their expert said it was worth 5 cents – then, rather than considering two experts were disagreeing – they claimed Trump lied. And, if he repeated that expert’s claim 100 times, then it was claimed he lied 100 times.
Difference of opinion is another area.
If Trump has a different opinion than the fine outlet (sarcasm) – he lied. He’s not allowed not to agree, it would seem.
And then there are the exaggerations merely to make a point. They are called hyperbole. You know, statements not meant to be taken literally. Like when I say, “As I’ve said a millions times” – it’s understood that I really didn’t say whatever a million times, but I’ve said it lots – maybe half a million? Yet, when President Trump does likewise – it’s called a lie by the fine outlet (sarcasm).
You may wonder what all this has to do with the riots, indoctrination, Animal Farm, 1984, and the Judicial Committee hearing with Bill Barr.
Everything.
Lies mold perceptions.
Perceptions define reception.
Reception defines reaction.
In short, if you believe one man is truthful and the other is a liar, you will most likely believe the one you consider truthful over the one you consider a liar, right? But what if your truthful man is mistakenly wrong or actually lying? What if you are blowing off the man who is actually telling you the truth, because you believe him to be a liar?
That’s the point.
When one let’s perceptions rule the roost, so to speak, rather than consider anything contrary to what they have been told and encouraged to believe – they have allowed bias to destroy their ability to come to an informed conclusion about anything. Instead, they become indoctrinated puppets to be used at will – not the smart people they think they are.
Normally, people ask questions they would like the answer to. So why would anyone, except for the people that create, present and believe all the propaganda suffocating our very existence just now, be so excited that Barr was treated with such disrespect and not allowed to answer the questions posed to him?
Wasn’t that the whole point after all – to ask and get answers?
Then, though we viewed and heard what transpired, Democrats actually came out and portrayed a scenario that suggested Barr was the rude one and Barr talked over everyone. Oh, hear me laugh rudely at their audacity to attempt a gaslight moment as I “take my time back.”
I think of the riots and wonder how anyone can actually justify allowing them to happen. It’s good because why?
It’s justified because of built up anger and oppression?
Does that mean I can go smack Nancy Pelosi around, steal her ice cream and set fire to her expensive refrigerators, because she has so upset me because her decisions affected me badly?
Well, of course not.
Neither is there an excuse for all the riots that are occurring or the people in authority that are allowing the harm to businesses, their cities and their citizens.
What’s wrong with these people?
Why are so many listening to them? Will they continue to listen once it is their home that is being destroyed and family hurt or killed?
I’ve read Animal Farm & 1984. It should be required reading for those indoctrinated puppets that have fallen victim to the propaganda of the pigs (not cops) that start out being the heroes only to lose their fairness in the pursuit of power.
Furthermore, no one should want recorded history changed from what it actually was, except for those who feel guilty for what they or their predecessors have done.
Who is trying to remove history?
It certainly isn’t the Republicans or pro-Trump people.
Shouldn’t that give pause?
Shouldn’t it give reason to take a look at what is actually transpiring, rather than what one is being told is the reality they should accept as theirs, though it really isn’t a “reality” at all?
Riots are occurring.
Governors – not Trump – are allowing those riots!
Citizens are being attacked because of the Democrats – not Trump.
Do you really think it is okay for people to be attacked because they happen to be on the street or in their business or homes, while rioters decide to do their wrongful deeds?
Some seem to be all in for the riots, so they can blame Trump, but it isn’t his fault. Nothing that can be said or done will make it his blame to claim.
Before I close, which I intend to do…
My approach is to prove myself wrong in any situation. If I can’t – then I am most likely right.
Someone tells me a video proves something? I watch it with that in mind as a possibility.
Someone tells me someone said something? I listen with that in mind as a possibility.
I have no problem being wrong, if I am wrong.
I’m like – okay.
What I do have a problem with are people who are indoctrinated puppets, who seem to have a toddler IQ, gaslighter intent, or simply the willingness to follow the pack and spew whatever is the talking point (truth or false) against the other side for the day.
Again…
Riots are occurring, which are illegal & officers should be allowed (required) to step in and stop them.
Governors, who stop officers from acting within the law, should be charged with all crimes committed as a result. In other words, if I am slugged because a governor forbade the officers to enforce the law – that governor should be accountable for the assault on me.
If you don’t agree, I guess someone can come slug you, your kids, mom or dad and that is okay – cause, in your mind, riots are good and anything that happens as a result of the riot is good.
What a stupid thought.
It’s time to take a step back and consider all things based on truth – rather than political illusion and the puppet feed thrown out by the hate vultures to be consumed by the ill-informed.
Riots are wrong.
Kicking people in the head is wrong.
Ganging up on a person is wrong.
Burning down or otherwise destroying someone’s property is wrong.
Lying about someone is wrong.
Lying about what someone said is wrong.
Trying to take over power by deceit and for wrongful purpose is wrong.
What was once wrong, and works of fiction, has become our daily lives because…?
It’s time to take back our sanity and control of our lives!
It’s time to tell the radicals of both parties that we are done with them!
It’s time to seek and focus on the truth!
Trump isn’t the one that has being lying!
It’s time to admit it!
Copyright © 2020 Carrie K. Hutchens
