Stop the Bullying: The One-sided Affair

crossing fingers 2I’m not going to mince words.  I’m tired of the radical agenda driven peoples, claiming special consideration for gay teens, while then claiming they are fighting “bullying” of teens.  No, you aren’t.  You are fighting the bullying of specific groups — not bullying itself.

That’s wrong!

That’s as wrong as the act of bullying.

Let’s have some real discussion here…

Gay teens are bullied?  Only gay teens?  Yeah, right!

If the supposed grown-ups would fight the act of bullying — then it would be a fight to stop bullying of all.  That would include gays. However, when only gays are the protected group of kids — it not only leaves out the other bullied kids, it adds to those who are. It is, after all, a protection at the expense of others.  What part of this picture can’t these activists see or comprehend?  Or, is it that it doesn’t matter to them?  Is it that it doesn’t fit their true agenda of promotion?

It doesn’t matter if gay teens have been bullied for a hundred years — so have the nerds and others — that doesn’t make this wrongness any righter.

A woman said to me that it is a matter of “respect”.  Yeah, and people should be taught to be respectful just because they should be respectful.  There should be no need to isolate the gays into some special group that everyone must respect, while not demanding the same respect for all others be returned.

I tried to make the point to one person, that teens, who do not believe in open sexuality, should not be forced to “embrace” open homosexuality.  They shouldn’t be forced to take part in things such as “Gay Pride Day”, or, if they are, that they are then the ones being bullied.  And we don’t get this because?

Oh, it doesn’t fit the true agenda?

From what I have seen of Gay Pride parades, it is a show of perversion — and a demand of that “in your face” perversion being accepted or else — not individuals attempting to show they are like everyone else.  Nope!  It’s shock and hostility at it’s best.

It appears that teens are being taught they have a “right” to be rude and lewd in public.  It appears they are being taught that if someone is offended by the public rude and lewd behavior, that person is an intolerant enemy to be punished.  After all, how dare someone think “certain behavior” is inappropriate in public no matter who is involved in the performance?

A man once told me that all he and his activist friends wanted was to be treated equally.  Fine, then accept the consequences equally for the “behavior” that is not acceptable in a public setting.  Stop doing the “in your face, I dare you to say or do anything” actions, while then crying intolerance because someone was offended.  Stop demanding special treatment, especially at the expense of others.

Not everyone likes my hair color or the way I wear it.  Are they intolerant?  Shouldn’t they be forced to love it?  Shouldn’t we have a Carrie’s Hair Day at school each year?  That will force everyone to be more tolerant of my hair, won’t it?  Ridiculous?  Well, so is a day celebrating homosexuality.

It’s one thing to teach teens they are special and to be there for them during those rough years, but quite another to indoctrinate them into the world of hostility and victimhood, and suggesting they now have rights they don’t afford others.  They have the right to be intolerant while demanding tolerance.  They have a right to behave in public as though they walked out of an XXX rated movie, while in a “G” public setting.  That’s wrong!  That’s simply wrong!

If I saw a teen (or anyone) being bullied, I would step-in (or call for help) to stop it.  I wouldn’t even be thinking “why” the bullying was taking place.  That’s because I see bullying as wrong regardless of the victim of it.  Not so for some of those I speak of.  These so-called righteous activists, seem to think it’s quite okay to bully the Christian teens because they don’t want to take part in something they feel is offensive — a Sex Day at school — while supposedly crying out against bullying.

I don’t see these activists, I speak of, doing the kids any favors at all.  They aren’t teaching kids self-respect and how to be respectful to others.  They are teaching hate, hostility, victim-hood, lewdness, rudeness, self-centeredness, blindness,deafness, intolerance, disrespect for self and a life centered around “sex”, rather than centered around self and all that the person can be.  Sex first — all else later, if ever.

Yes, let’s stop the bullying, some activists say, as though the ONLY victims are, or have ever been, gay teens.  Yes, let’s stop the bullying for ALL, unless they happen to be Christian teens (for example), who don’t want to take part in a celebration of sexuality (that has no business being in the school experience anyway).  Now, in that case, it is quite okay to bully them, call them names and demand they give up their beliefs or else.  Yep, that’s different. It’s also why this is a one-sided affair.  An affair that has little to do with an attempt to stop bullying because bullying is wrong in and of itself, but rather — stop the bullying of a select group ONLY, even if it is at the expense of other teens.

Yes, these activists worry so much about the “bullying of teens” and how it so negatively impacts them.  Well, if they are gay teens that is.  Christian teens being bullied and vilified is, in this one-sided affair, quite a different story.  So, I guess this alleged “anti-bullying” movement isn’t really about “anti-bullying” after all, is it?

The Liberal Tolerance Once Again Shows Itself For What It Is NOT — Tolerant

I have just finished reading (and sharing)  “Archbishop prays while topless gay activists shout curses and douse him with water” by John-Henry Westen (LifeSiteNews.com – Wed Apr 24, 2013 16:44 EST).  To say that I am appalled is an understatement of understatements.  To say what I want to say, is not allowed.  It isn’t politically correct – it’s accurate!

If I were someone in the process of considering that supporting gay marriage is “the right thing to do” – the behavior of these “tolerant” activists would have decided me otherwise.  It was rude and totally unnecessary.   It proved nothing more than that these activists are rude, intolerant and perverted.

I don’t see men and women exposing themselves, to sell the world on gun rights.  They present their arguments not their personals.  But then, it seems that gay activists have to shock and try to force people to “embrace & celebrate” their vulgarity and insistence that we all watch their sexuality in action and be delighted that we had the chance to do so.

Archbishop Andre-Joseph Leonard has class, unlike the topless liberals.

Gay activists have once again proven that while they DEMAND respect, tolerance and acceptance – they have none for others.  Their offerings appear to be the total substance of – shock and perversion.   Perhaps it is time to keep the shirts on and act like one has some respect for self and others, even the ones that don’t agree with them.  Perhaps!  But in the meantime, we are watching the intolerance of the liberal demanding tolerance for self and self beliefs only!