Category Archives: Blogs

No, Joe, you didn’t make me proud

by

Joe Biden, I found your behavior at the VP debate to be rude and obnoxious.  I found nothing amusing and definitely nothing to be proud of.

Personally, I like to hear both sides and make my own decisions about what I hear.  I don’t appreciate people, like you, Joe, who try to distract, make it impossible for me to hear, or simply interrupt and take the conversation away from the very thing I wanted the answer to.

Of course, I guess that all works for Obama and you, Joe.  Apparently, you aren’t interested in the American people “hearing” the answers and therefore allowed a chance of making up their own minds.  No, you seem to want to make up our minds for us by signaling what you think is amusing or serious and, therefore, just how you suppose we should react to whatever the topic is at hand.

You’re wrong, Joe.

As a Catholic, I find you even more offensive than your mere inappropriate behavior at the debate.  How dare you say there is no attack on religious freedom?  Do you think we (most of us) are so stupid that we don’t get it?  Is that what you are having so much trouble not laughing your fool head off about?

Well, Joe, I have a secret for you — we do get it.  We know where you and your Obama leader stand.  You stand against the Catholic Church you claim to be a part of.  You stand against religious freedom, if it is Christian — especially Catholic.  Then, you mock any who dare suggest this is obviously so?

I’m not impressed, Joe.

That’s right, Joe, I’m really not impressed.  Just who is your God and what is your religion, when you think it is quite okay to support so many things that go against the teachings of the church you claim to be a part of?

When did you suddenly think it was okay to tell the rest of us that it was (and is) okay to believe in your “new” view of the Catholic religion in the “new” political style?  You know… politicians deciding what the Catholic Church should (and does) stand for and then all the while ignoring the Pope, Bishops and real church beliefs?

I don’t know when you got there, Joe, but I do think you have a few surprises in store for you and I’m not so sure you will be laughing and mocking, when it’s time for you to be evaluated by the One with the most important and ultimate vote.

Good luck.

 

The Dangers of Trusting Claire McCaskill

by

1

Todd Akin made a statement relying upon outdated scientific material.  He said that pregnancy from a rape was rare because of what a woman’s body does during the trauma of a “legitimate rape.”  People pounced on the allegation that women rarely get pregnant from a rape and the term of “legitimate.”

Perhaps Candidate Akin should have verified his information, but at least he didn’t pull that belief out of nowhere and put it out there to simply support his position.  He was going on an actual scientific study that had once been put out there as verified fact.  He had every reason to believe his information was accurate.  When he found out differently — he admitted so.

As for the term “legitimate rape”… people knew what he meant, or should have.  He wasn’t trying to downplay the horrors of rape or insult victims.   He said that pregnancy resulting from rape was rare, not that it never happened.  Therefore, it shouldn’t have been considered another case of the victimizing the victim.  At worse, it was merely poorly chosen words in this nit-pick society we have become.

Akin may have relied upon outdated material, but it was once the current medical findings.  He may have used the wrong adjective and set the world on fire.  However, it was Claire McCaskill that has shown her true colors over this matter.

On August 21st and updated September 4, 2012, KCTV5 reported:

> U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill said Tuesday that her GOP opponent should be given the benefit of the doubt about his unfortunate choice of words.

The Kansas City news channel quoted McCaskill as saying:

> “Congressman Akin and I disagree on some things, but he is sincere,” McCaskill said. “And while I disagree with what he said, he has now, just in the last few hours, really apologized for what he said.”

Claire McCaskill was being fair and calling for others to be as well, right?

On September 26, 2012, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, published “Todd Akin moves forward as Claire McCaskill deepens attack with ‘legitimate rape’ ad”, which says in part:

> McCaskill, meanwhile, wasted no time in opening up on Akin over his controversial comments last month on rape and pregnancy, now that she can do so without fear of driving him off the ballot and getting a new opponent.

> “Todd Akin said only some rapes are legitimate,” an announcer says in a McCaskill ad, marking her campaign’s first real foray into an issue that has rocked the national political landscape. “What will he say next?”

Claire McCaskill said her opponent really apologized and should be given the benefit of the doubt.  Well, apparently she meant “only” until she was sure he wasn’t going to bow out of the race.  Now, she seems to want us to doubt him and the misstatement has become something for her to attack him for.

Akin may have said it poorly, but at least he said what he believed to be true.  McCaskill?  Well, it looks like what she says is not always what she believes, but hey, this is politics, isn’t it?  Fight dirty and hope the people are too dumbed-down to see what is going on right in front of them.

Oh, and next time Claire tells you something, you might want to wait a few days and find out what she is saying then.  After all, the Akin situation does show the dangers of trusting Claire McCaskill, the honorable appearing candidate today, but the real politician tomorrow — not so much so.

The Liberals & The Phony War On Women

by

For the thousandth & one(th) time — the Republicans and Conservatives have not declared “War on Women”.  However the Liberals claiming such a war exists are clearly declaring war on the sanity of men and women alike.  It isn’t real.  It’s a political figment used to tick women and their allies off and hopefully sway votes.  It’s a cheater’s game.  And cheaters can never be trusted, especially to tell the truth about what they are up.

No one is trying to take away contraceptives.  They are readily available.  All the allegedly bad people are doing is saying they shouldn’t be required to pay for other peoples’ sex lives.  This is a war on women?  Give me a break.

Viagra is totally free of cost?  Then charge a co-pay for it, if that is what is behind women thinking contraceptives should be totally free (or at least charged to their employer), and make everyone happy.  Problem solved.

There are people out here that must pay co-pays for life-sustaining meds, but the focus is on making the Catholic and other religious institutions pay for contraceptives that they don’t believe in?  Taking away religious freedom is okay as long as the women get their sex freebies?  How responsible and sane is that?

No one is trying to deny women sex.  The argument that the conservatives are, sounds as though it is coming out of kid’s playbook.  “You just don’t love me.  You just don’t want me to have any fun.”  (Stomping feet comes to mind as well.)

The real argument is that contraceptives can be obtained and there is no attempt to stop it.  On the other hand, religious institutions and business owners, who have religious objections, are being told they will have to pay no matter their objections.  The so-called enlightened have deemed this to be.

The War isn’t on women.  The War is on Religious Freedom!

Women are just being used by the radical liberals & their pals, but they are too into “self” and the load of stuff fed to them to see it.  One day though, the truth will come home to haunt and they will see this was just a stripping of freedom and they were the tools to help make that happen.  One day, they may be willing to pay those contraceptive co-pays just to undo what was wrongly done.  It could very well be too late and there will be no one to blame but those who made it happen.

The Liberals & The Phony War On Women

by

For the thousandth & one(th) time — the Republicans and Conservatives have not declared “War on Women”.  However the Liberals claiming such a war exists are clearly declaring war on the sanity of men and women alike.  It isn’t real.  It’s a political figment used to tick women and their allies off and hopefully sway votes.  It’s a cheater’s game.  And cheaters can never be trusted, especially to tell the truth about what they are up.

No one is trying to take away contraceptives.  They are readily available.  All the allegedly bad people are doing is saying they shouldn’t be required to pay for other peoples’ sex lives.  This is a war on women?  Give me a break.

Viagra is totally free of cost?  Then charge a co-pay for it, if that is what is behind women thinking contraceptives should be totally free (or at least charged to their employer), and make everyone happy.  Problem solved.

There are people out here that must pay co-pays for life-sustaining meds, but the focus is on making the Catholic and other religious institutions pay for contraceptives that they don’t believe in?  Taking away religious freedom is okay as long as the women get their sex freebies?  How responsible and sane is that?

No one is trying to deny women sex.  The argument that the conservatives are, sounds as though it is coming out of kid’s playbook.  “You just don’t love me.  You just don’t want me to have any fun.”  (Stomping feet comes to mind as well.)

The real argument is that contraceptives can be obtained and there is no attempt to stop it.  On the other hand, religious institutions and business owners, who have religious objections, are being told they will have to pay no matter their objections.  The so-called enlightened have deemed this to be.

The War isn’t on women.  The War is on Religious Freedom!

Women are just being used by the radical liberals & their pals, but they are too into “self” and the load of stuff fed to them to see it.  One day though, the truth will come home to haunt and they will see this was just a stripping of freedom and they were the tools to help make that happen.  One day, they may be willing to pay those contraceptive co-pays just to undo what was wrongly done.  It could very well be too late and there will be no one to blame but those who made it happen.

Offensive Thoughts or Political Games?

by

I’ve just read, “Ark. GOP calls candidates’ statements ‘offensive'”, via Yahoo news and I just don’t know what my reaction should be towards Rep. John Hubbard, the title or article itself, but I do know what my reaction is in the over-all scheme of it all.

A quote from that piece regarding Rep. John Hubbard is:

 

Hubbard wrote in his 2009 self-published book, “Letters To The Editor: Confessions Of A Frustrated Conservative,” that “the institution of slavery that the black race has long believed to be an abomination upon its people may actually have been a blessing in disguise.” He also wrote that African-Americans were better off than they would have been had they not been captured and shipped to the United States.


Okay, that could sound pretty bad —  or not — especially if we don’t know the rest of what he wrote.

Sometimes bad things have to happen to create and allow for good things, or to turn a person down a different and most wondrous path they would have never otherwise traveled.

Is that what this man meant and was trying to say?

Was he trying to say that slavery was a horrendous thing, but if we couldn’t stop it (because we are here and it was then), at least some good came of it?  Was he trying to simply point out the blessings, while not condoning the horrors?

Obviously, we’ll not know what was on his mind or in his book unless we read it or ask him, or maybe even give him a chance to explain what he was trying to say.  Yet, we are to take brief quotes, (without further explanation or context clarification), as ones that defines this Representative and whether he is worthy of a vote?

I don’t think so!

I would like some more information before I decide who is the bad guy or gal in this scenario.

In short:  This smells like politics at its worst, rather than some hidden secret revealed just in time, and I think everyone should refuse to play.

Voting is not a game!  It’s time to stop acting like it is.

Teacher Missed History Class: Compares Romney/Ryan to KKK

by

Surprise!  Surprise!  Teacher is confused or missed required history classes in her pursuit of a teaching degree and compares Romney/Ryan to KKK?  Or, perhaps it is just a sign of the times.  Radical Islam to be tolerated.  Christianity not so much so.  Koran good.  Bible bad.  Liberalism = perfectionalism.  Conservatism = acceptable focus of insult & intolerance.

According to Lee Brodie’s article, “Teacher Ridicules Student for Romney T-Shirt” (CNBC – Yahoo.com):

Many Republicans can’t help but wonder if a student wearing a pro-Obama T-Shirt in a Philadelphia school would have been subject to the kind of humiliation that Samantha Pawlucy was forced to endure.
The 16-year old sophomore, who attends Charles Carroll High School, told CNBC’s Larry Kudlow, that she was humiliated by a teacher for wearing a T-shirt in support of Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan.

She said the teacher compared her to the worst racists in history — the Ku Klux Klan.

How ridiculous is this?

The KKK was not founded by the conservatives.  It is a product of the Democrats.  Yes, the Democrats — the very same people that fought civil rights and provided and fought for the murder of thousands of babies from the Black community via Planned Parenthood.  So, where did this confused teacher get the idea that a Romney/Ryan t-shirt is equal to the Ku Klux Klan?

Where oh where does any liberal idea come from?  Nobody knows.  It was just there one day and becomes fact, even if it isn’t and no matter how many history classes confirm the error of thought.

Yes, indeed, it appears this teacher must have missed history classes and went to the “Blame Bush” class instead, where transference becomes a virtue as long as that transference is being placed upon the Conservative or anything not considered PC that day.

Walking Into A Wall: Living With the Liberal Perspective

by

Walking into a wall would be more pleasant and less of a slam than trying to live with the out-of-control liberal perspective that is tainting the world and daily in our face with lies and distortions.  Yet, while we would be trying on a strait jacket if we picked walking into the wall, it’s considered normal and sane to silently endure the liberal politicians and media game of in our face lying and telling us what we heard or saw is not what we really heard and saw?

It’s a dizzy and strange thought that we are to know something is a lie and yet accept it as the truth because it is the present popular thing to do according to they.

One day we are told it — whatever it might be — will never happen.  It is simply wrong to even consider it and the other side is definitely wrong for suggesting it.

Next day we are told it — whatever it was — has happened because it was “the right thing to do” and it was done in spite of the other side trying to block it.

Okay.  Does that then mean that yesterday was erased from the calendar or is it verifiable evidence that there is a segment of our society that seems to suffer from delusions and disconnect from the rational reality realm the rest of us live in?

Excuse me.  I think I’ll go check out the nearest wall.  Care to join me?

Obama Could Win In Spite of Lies?

by

It’s amazing to read all the articles suggesting that Obama has a steady lead over Romney, has momentum and could actually win the election.  Hey folks, did you all forget Obama & Playmates lied about Libya?  That’s pretty important stuff there.  And that doesn’t even include the fact that no one has explained to the American people or to the Stevens’ family, why the Ambassador didn’t have extra security on September 11th.  Someone dropped the ball.  Who is it again that is in charge of present decisions?  That would be Obama and his administration, would it not?  Or, did Bush somehow sneak in again and call the shots when the O & Pals weren’t looking?

Obama & Playmates lied about Libya.  That has been proven.  The Obama administration is reported to have known within 24 hours that the attack on the embassy was, in fact, a terrorist attack, yet they kept claiming it was a spontaneous reaction to an unknown movie.

Obama & Playmates lied about the Joe Soptic case with the ad that implied that Romney was responsible for the man’s wife dying.  Have people already forgotten Obama’s Pals saying they had nothing to do with Soptic and didn’t know the circumstances?  That was proven to be a lie.  Obama Pal Stephanie Cutter knew all about Joe Soptic and she got caught lying.  Didn’t stop her from continuing to make smiling, cutesy television appearances.

It was implied by Cutter that Romney may have committed a felony.  Obama’s people tried to say they didn’t say that.  Really?  I guess the American people who actually heard and read the accusation are to be considered delusional by the Obama administration.  Or, perhaps Obama & Playmates are just hoping to get the idea into people’s minds and pretend the claim of innocence that it didn’t come from them.  “We didn’t say that.  Believe us — not your own eyes & ears.”

These are only two instances where lies were implied by Obama’s Playmate Stephanie Cutter and both found to be what they were… an attempt to suggest wrong-doing on the part of Mitt Romney that didn’t exist.  That’s bad enough.  That’s wrong.  That shows that Obama & Playmates have no hesitation in lying to the public.  And, for any who wish to claim that is just politics — what about Libya?  What about the death of Ambassador Stevens and the other three men?  Is that just politics as well?

Obama didn’t provide proper security for our people on the anniversary of September 11th.  He then lied about the attack.  He had his Pals out there lying about it.  He lied some more about it.  So what else is he lying about?

Obama & Playmates obviously have difficulty with the truth.  But then one must also wonder if they were so busy with the campaign (and making up convenient “implies”) that they slacked-off on their actual jobs, allowing four men to be brutally killed.  Or, are they simply that inept in the positions they hold?  Whatever the problem — there is definitely a problem — Obama can so “in-our-face” lie and still have a chance to win?  Something is wrong with that picture.  Did someone put the film in backwards or are voters simply “that” gullible that they don’t get it when they have been had?  Then again… maybe it is just the mainstream media fooling with us?

Senator Patty Murray & Ladies of Like-Mind, Your Spins Are Demeaning

by

1

My first response to Todd Akin’s “ladylike” comment was — you have got to be kidding!  Grown-up women in politics can’t grasp they are ladies as opposed to the guys being called gentleman or acting gentlemanly?  It’s got to be a slam?  It’s got to be demeaning?

This world, and especially politics & some politicians, have lost their common sense and comprehension skills, it would seem.  They blow up little stuff to such an extent that it is difficult to get excited or know when something actually major or inappropriate did take place.  And, instead of being upset with Akin, I’m upset with the childish cries of people such as Senator Patty Murray (D-Washington) who think the national party ought to scream that Akin is a bad boy and used the demeaning term “ladylike.”  How dare he?

I would like the Democrats to repudiate your comments, Senator Murray, because I find your remarks to be insulting and demeaning to women, who earn their votes, jobs and promotions without having to resort to stupid spins that have nothing to do with anything of importance.  It’s your behavior and reaction that makes women look bad, not some man saying some woman didn’t act as ladylike as she once had.

And, if Claire McCaskill is worried about the “ladylike” comment and having to rely upon spins to get votes — she isn’t the candidate of the past, who suggested she is person enough to stand strong for Missourians.  Instead, the citizens of Missouri would always have to wonder when she might get her little feelings hurt and have to focus her attention on getting others to repudiate whatever and make the big, bad man apologize and go away!

Murray & Ladies of Like-Mind, your willingness to spin is both demeaning and a suggestion that “some” politicians are simply too weak to do the tough job.  Are you suggesting Claire McCaskill is one of them?

Obama Lies & Then Expects Trust & Idolization?

by

I may be one of a few, if the Obama leaning polls are correct, but I’m tired of the lies coming from the president and his administration.  Likewise, I’m tired of the mainstream media that insists we blindly trust, automatically block out the lies we catch Obama & Playmates in, and dutifully take part in idolization of their “The One.”  Sorry Pals & Playmates, I’m not playing nor am I donating to your playground!

Obama & Playmates know darn good and well what Romney meant and that he wasn’t referring to 47% being on Obama’s Welfare Roll, but does the truth matter to them?  No, it’s time to spin the truth into something unrecognizable for political gain.

How many times did Obama lie and say that the death of Ambassador Stevens and the three staff members was the result of a movie?  How many times did he apologize for the movie that actually wasn’t at fault?  How much taxpayer money did he use for ads over in the Muslim world denouncing the not-responsible movie?  Yet, we are to trust and idolize him and his Playmates?  I don’t think so!

Just what is it they are thinking, especially when they tell us we didn’t hear or see what we think we saw and heard, even though we did?  Are we considered too stupid to comprehend what is truth and what is a lie or are we considered totally irrelevant?  Obama & Playmates do, after all, have his followers of ignorance.  (Listen to:  “You Can’t Make This Crap Up Alert: Howard Stern Exposes Stupidity of Obama Backers.”)  Are they plentiful enough to erase our informed opinions?  It’s something to worry about.

I don’t know how many followers of ignorance Obama & Playmates have, but I know that I’m not one of them.  My trust is saved for the truth-teller and I blindly idolize no man or woman that walks upon this earth, no matter what Obama & Playmates and the mainstream media insist upon.

Politics & Dirty Spins: The Obama Campaign

by

Campaigns should be a method by which we learn who the candidates are, their beliefs and proposed plans should he or she be elected to office.  What it shouldn’t be is dirty tricks and spins that distort the issues and positions, simply because a campaign has good lying spinners on its team.  After all, when one spins a comment into appearing to say something never intended — they are in fact intentionally lying.

After watching the dirty campaign presented by Obama and his playmates, I would never in my wildest dreams vote for him and find it quite surprising that others aren’t as offended as I am by the pride his staff and some supports takes in “spinning” the facts into something that can hardly be recognized after they get done with them.  Who can lie and distort best, isn’t what we should base our votes on.  However, some call it good politics.  I call it what it truly is — a disgrace!

Will the election be won by propaganda experts, tainted politics and dirty spins?  I don’t know how it will turn out, but I do know that when I go to the polls on November 6th, I intend to vote for integrity!

Surprise: Obama & Carney, Romney isn’t president yet

by

Romney is a presidential candidate.  You see, he hasn’t yet made it to president-hood.  He was apparently discussing campaigning strategy during that secretly filmed fundraising event, not what American people he would represent as President of the United States of America.  Don’t tell me that Obama & his personnel haven’t likewise had such discussion.  The difference is that no one secretly filmed it and then put it out there.

It would be so hilarious, if it weren’t so pathetic and Animal Farm/1984ish, as they attempt to tell us a different story than what has been and once upon a time documented.

Obama, according to Carney, wouldn’t ignore any group of people, because as president he represents them all.  Carney might want to tell that to the Black preachers who feel Obama is ignoring the Blacks.  Or, perhaps he would like to tell those who see Obama ignoring the white working class.  Maybe he would even like to tell that to the Christians that feel Obama only cares about their vote — not their religious freedom.  Yeah, he might want to do that, but he won’t.  Instead, he will probably pretend none of that (or the articles) exists, but they do anyway.

I hate to break it to Obama and Carney, but Romney isn’t the president.  He is still campaigning — not acting as president and not representing the people as the president yet.  But… give him time.

Romney Caught Talking: Media Pounces

by

The hidden camera scheme seems to be getting coverage and trying to make Romney the bad guy for saying that a percentage of Americans don’t pay taxes and that some feel they deserve assistance.  It appears to me that Mitt Romney was saying that he could not worry about a certain segment of these voters, because they would lean towards Obama and his government assistance programs, regardless of what he (Romney) says or does.  What is the big deal about that?

It is amazing what people will pounce on and try to make a big bad deal of when there is actually nothing to it in the first place.  This is one of those cases.  This is where the audience should be going, “So?  What’s your point?”

I woke up to a whiny voice going on and on about how Romney doesn’t care about these people.  Oh, let’s insert our opinions in there and decide what he does or doesn’t care about.  Why bother saying it appears he doesn’t care?  Let’s make sure we say it as fact.  After all, there are people that won’t stop to think that we can’t possibly know what Romney is thinking, unless he tells us or by some action shows us.  Thus far, he has done neither.  He has merely said that he can’t worry about these voters, because they will stand by Obama and his government projects.

When the media is forever talking about campaign strategy, we don’t get that the candidates sometimes need to pick and choose the voters they will focus on?  Obviously, when there is limited time, it wouldn’t make much sense to focus on a group that most likely can’t be swayed for whatever the reason.  In this case, Romney apparently felt he couldn’t sway a certain segment of Obama’s following and said so.

I say again …

What’s the big deal about that?

It is Bush & the Republicans’ Fault: Obama’s Invisible Plan

by

Obama always seems to have a plan and it is always better than everyone else’s, but where is this fabulous plan?  Why isn’t it in effect?  Why isn’t it working?  Why aren’t things better?  To hear Obama and his administration tell it — it all must be Bush and the Republicans’ fault.  It can’t be Obama’s or his administration.

If Obama and his crowd had the votes and the power to push through ObamaCare, against the will of a majority of people, why wouldn’t he likewise have votes and power to push through budgets and financial plans to get the economy rolling and in good shape?  Maybe because he hadn’t focused on a workable economic plan, because he was too busy thinking about free birth control and the right to leave a baby dying after a live birth during an abortion procedure?

So let’s sum things up: We have a “Fact Checker” column that is  headlined, “Did Obama vote to deny rights to infant abortion  survivors?” The column unearths enough evidence that a reasonable person would conclude he did vote to deny rights to abortion survivors. And if his record on this is in any way defensible, why did Obama feel the need not just to lie about  his record but accuse others of lying about him in the process?   I know what you’re thinking. Obama must be off the Pinocchio scale here. Guess again:

The evidence suggests we could have awarded Four Pinocchios to the former Illinois senator for his comments to the  Christian Broadcasting Network, but that interview is several years old now, and it’s not the focus of this particular column.

They award him no Pinocchios. Unbelievable. Apparently, he lied  about his record so long ago—all the way back in ’08—that his dishonesty then isn’t relevant to the current claim being made that Obama voted to deny rights to infant abortion survivors.    Some facts are just too politically inconvenient to check,  apparently.   ~ (The Weekly Standard – by Mark Hemingway – September 11, 2012)

We hear little about an actual well-thought out economic plan, but we do hear how women should have “free” birth control and abortions at the “unnecessary” expense of churches and religious institutions.  We even hear how this is important because Obama wants it for his daughters.  Great expectations there.

Maybe instead of sex related issues and fighting to let live babies simply die, Obama and his crowd should have been figuring out how we could earn a decent living again and be able to pay for our homes and support the children we love and are fighting to protect?  Yes,  perhaps that is what should have been done, rather than always talking about that vague (invisible or near so) plan and blaming Bush and the Republicans.

It’s time to give unto Obama what is Obama’s and take back our country and respect for life, including that of helpless little babies who were aborted alive and continued to fight desperately to live.  May they no longer be the invisible victims.

The Joke of the Polls: Either Romney or Obama in the Lead Today

by

2

There was a time that I took polls seriously, but that time has long since passed.  Now they have become a form of entertainment and a tool to evaluate the legitimacy of the MSM (mainstream media) and level of propaganda being spouted for the day.  Actually, many polls and the use of them remind me of soap operas and the ongoing saga meant to dramatize and fictionalize, with little resemblance to reality.

I’ve seen polls that had people way out ahead and unbeatable, only for those to be beaten badly.  One clear memorable example of “Ooops Polling Results” happened in reference to New Hampshire.  Obama was predicted to be the clear winner — Hillary Clinton won instead.

Let’s also not forget that at one point, Hillary Clinton was considered the unbeatable candidate to get the DNC nomination.  That changed rather quickly, did it not?

The election polls, for example, to have the slightest chance of accuracy and non-bias sampling, would need to have untainted questions by an untainted questioner or source.  There would also need to be an equal sampling from among all the various groups that will (would) affect the election results.  (More questioned in any specific group than any other, would undoubtedly taint the results.)

The delicate nature of obtaining  true and accurate poll results should leave us all with a major question to ask ourselves and others.  How can polls be taken as gospel, when so many variables are at play?  Yet, often they are.  And some people, wanting to be on the winning side, will go with the candidate who appears to be the favorite of everyone else and for no other reason.   The MSM knows that and I believe they use it to try and sell the candidate of their choice.  I, for one, will have none of that.

The MSM may not realize it yet, but people have taken note of them not vetting Obama or doing serious investigative reporting when the     answers might make him look less than the all-perfect one.  Yes, it is quite obvious who many in the MSM are pushing to be the winner on     November 6th.  Some of them are the same people who are giving us poll numbers that seem to support their favorite candidate.

Yes, there was a time I took polls seriously.  There was a time that I had respect for the MSM and thought they were trying to be objective and careful to present only facts.  Now I see obvious propaganda spilled onto the airwaves and watch as some of these people pretend to be reporters and journalists.  And to this I have to say     — If I wanted to watch a soap opera and the daily polling saga that bounces between Romney and Obama at any given time, I would have turned the channel to one of the soaps in the first place.

One thing I know for sure about tomorrow — Romney or Obama will be in the lead and someone will be telling us so.